Sunday, February 21, 2010

Should I Spend 300 On Tripod I Am Interested In Getting Into Photography. What Do I Need And What Should I Get?

I am interested in getting into photography. What do I need and what should I get? - should i spend 300 on tripod

I always had an interest in photography. I like the manipulation of images in the photo shop and do some design work independently. However, until that time I have used more photography, or to avoid the area all together. Recently I had seems to be an interest in photography, but the area difficult for several reasons:

"It's expensive. From the looks of it, cost a decent camera, what, $ 700? Is then another $ 100-200 for the lens, then through a tripod, bag, etc.
-Equpiment obsolete too quickly. It seems that each point and shoot camera that I can only buy with the market. The next day, the cost of something is twice as good 1/4th! I remember spending $ 300 for a camera MP 4 or 4 years! (I do not know megapixels in notAge, but still)

So basically, what recommendations do you have? The quality of the photos that appear to come from my point of view, and shot are so terrible that it was disappointing. I blur even when shooting on a tripod in daylight! I know that other cameras are not so bad, but I want something that is good or not, for SLR beginners.

I know nothing about lenses and image processors, etc. I know that the quality of the photos to some of the Canon cameras tend to look, but I know of nothing about the election. You can use a camera for me to do? Something affordable, or better yet, something that will not quickly lose value if you lose interest. Used probably my best choice because it allows me to sell if LOSE interests without too big a blow.

Thank you for reading!

4 comments:

Yenta said...

I photograph on the page - weddings, children, photos, family portraits, groups of images, etc. Here is my list of teams:

Digital SLRs
Tripod
Different Lenses
Sub-Flash
Laptop with the editing software
Film SLR targets for the backup

I keep it simple. I am a firm believer to "get eh int road record to a special moment. Less material is used to more relaxed even on an issue, especially with small children.

I very little housework, because they are the appliances and lights missing decisions which do not enjoy this type of work available. If I have to do my inner work, that people know in advance that they shadow visit, and in the style of photojournalism.

I would definitely use a digital SLR camera, if I were you. You will receive immediate feedback on the design and lighting of your shot and can make the necessary changes. You can also use a lot more work without the film canisters.

Go as lenses, I think, I use a macro lens with a zoom long more often - I preferr the possibility of pictures without being aware of my presence to take on issues so much - you do not jump ahead of them. It also allows you to jam the target substantive implications for some of Nice. Digital gives you the freedom to change your will - to their RAW image into a black and white cultures in different ways, turning, machining, etc.

I would be unable to process under a 10-megapixel try to take one -, and at harvest images of greenhouse gases, you may lose in quality and finish with a blurry image, they do not have enough megapixels. In addition, you are extending an injection of normal size showing no loss of quality.

It is very easy to use a digital camera, and I was surprised at the difference it made in my work. It was difficult for me to transition from film to digital in my head, but rarely use my camera more film.

I my laptop for editing - but also germs. With the customer can, I show them the raw material immediately, and their ideas on what kind of question that they want published.

Also- David Hedgecoe I think (that's his name) has some good books on digital photography, there are good teachers.

Good luck - and have fun!

D L said...

read. to answer many of your questions.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/buy.htm

GotTheLo... said...

a Nikon SLR camera and various lenses, much less telescope. some filters.

Costs are too great.

ceaser aka odd said...

yes

Post a Comment